Costed with an automated Bill of ICT, TBM-aligned, with cross-agency transparency.
eHealth Queensland.
Every service in the catalog costed and published as an itemized Bill of IT, per agency, department and program. Cost per service comes from volume drivers and agreed percentage drivers. Shared platforms are split across agencies by drivers, with a trace from each charge back to the ledger.
Capability, not a customer result.
| Service | Volume | Unit cost | Charge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Service 1 | |||
| Service 2 | |||
| Service 3 | |||
| Service 4 | |||
| Total for this agency | |||
A published, defensible statement of what each agency consumed and what it cost. Queensland’s own term for it, and the format eHealth Queensland automated.
Money moving between public entities, each with its own accountability line and its own budget.
Cost per service across hundreds of services, not cost per application. eHealth Queensland costs 240+.
Numbers that have to survive an auditor, an official and a journalist. The bar for defensibility confidence and trust is higher than in a commercial chargeback.
Budgets set by an annual vote and spent against a service catalog that does not follow the fiscal year.
In a commercial chargeback, a disputed number costs you a difficult meeting. In a public one, it can cost you a headline.